Readings

• Hineline, P. N. (1986). Re-tuning the operant-respondent distinction. Analysis and integration of behavioral units, 55-79.
• Donahoe, J. W. (2014). Evocation of behavioral change by the reinforcer is the critical event in both the classical and operant procedures. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 27, 537–543.
• Pear, J. J., & Eldridge, G. D. (1984). The operant‐respondent distinction: Future directions. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42(3), 453-467.
• Williams, B. A. (1994). Conditioned reinforcement: Experimental and theoretical issues. TBA, 17(2), 261-285.
• Bell, M. C., & Williams, B. A. (2013). Conditioned reinforcement in chain schedules when time to reinforcement is held constant. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 99(2), 179-188.
• Rescorla, R. A. (1988). Pavlovian conditioning: It's not what you think it is. American psychologist, 43(3), 151.
• Bell, M. C., & McDevitt, M. A. (2014). Conditioned reinforcement. The Wiley Blackwell handbook of operant and classical conditioning, 221-248.
• Hineline, P. N., & Rosales-Ruiz, J. (2013). Behavior in relation to aversive events: Punishment and negative reinforcement.  In G. J. Madden, W. V. Dube, T. D. Hackenberg, G. P. Hanley, & K. A. Lattal (Eds.), APA handbook of behavior analysis, Vol. 1. Methods and principles (p. 483–512). American Psychological Association.
• Laurence, M. T., Hineline, P. N., & Bersh, P. J. (1994). The puzzle of responding maintained by response‐contingent shock. Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 61(2), 135-153.
• Benson, J. S., & Kennelly, K. J. (1976). Learned helplessness: The result of uncontrollable reinforcements or uncontrollable aversive stimuli?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(1), 138.
• Maier, S. F., & Seligman, M. E. (2016). Learned helplessness at fifty: Insights from neuroscience. Psychological review, 123(4), 349.
• McIlvane, W. J. (2013). Simple and complex discrimination learning. In G. J. Madden (Ed.), APA Handbook of Behavior Analysis., Vol. 2, American Psychological Association.
• Fields, L., Garruto, M., & Watanabe, M. (2010). Varieties of stimulus control in matching-to-sample: A kernel analysis. The Psychological Record, 60, 3-26.
• Goldiamond, I. (1966). Perception, language, and conceptualization rules. In B. Kleinmuntz (Ed.), Problem solving (pp. 183–224). New York: Wiley. This chapter is on electronic reserve through the UNT Library. Your instructor will supply you with a course passcode and you need that + your euid/euid password, to log in and view the pdf. 
• Bickel, W. K., & Etzel, B. C. (1985). The quantal nature of controlling stimulus-response relations as measured in tests of stimulus generalization. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 44(2), 245-270.
• Sidman, M. (2000). Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 127 – 146.
• Hayes, S.C. (1989).  A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence.  In L.J. Hayes & P.N. Chase (Eds). Dialogues on Verbal Behavior, (pp. 19-40). Context Press, Reno, NV. 
• Grace, R. C., & Hucks, A. D. (2013). The allocation of operant behavior. In G. J. Madden (Ed.), APA HBA.
• Hineline, P. N. (2001). Beyond the molar—molecular distinction: We need multiscaled analyses. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 75(3), 342-347.
• Epstein, R. (1985). The spontaneous interconnection of three repertoires. The Psychological Record, 35(2), 131-141.
• Shahan, T. A., Browning, K. O., & Nall, R. W. (2020). Resurgence as choice in context: Treatment duration and on/off alternative reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 113(1), 57-76,  

  https://doi-org.libproxy.library.unt.edu/10.1002/jeab.563.

• Steinfeld, M., Alcalá, J. A., Thrailkill, E. A., & Bouton, M. E. (2019). Renewal in a heterogeneous behavior chain: Extinction of the first response prevents renewal of a second response when it is separately extinguished and returned to the chain. Learning and Motivation, 68, 101587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2019.101587

Variability

• Schwartz, B. (1982). Failure to produce response variability with reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37(2), 171-181. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1982.37-171
• Doughty, A. H., Giorno, K. G., & Miller, H. L. (2013) Reinforcer magnitude on reinforced behavioral variability. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 100(3), 355-369.

Equivalence and RFT

• Galizio, M., Galizio, M., Bruce, K. E., & Bruce, K. E. (2018). Abstraction, multiple exemplar training and the search for derived stimulus relations in animals. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 41(1), 45-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-017-0112-y

Generalization and Concept Formation

• Clark, D. C. (1971). Teaching concepts in the classroom: A set of teaching prescriptions derived from experimental research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 62(3), 253–278. https://doi-org.libproxy.library.unt.edu/10.1037/h0031149 

Molar/Molecular and Matching Law

• Crowley, M. A., & Donahoe, J. W. (2004). matching: Its acquisition and generalization.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 82(2), 143-159. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2004.82-143
• Meazzini, P., & Ricci, C. (1986). Molar vs. molecular units of analysis. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.),Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 19-43).Erlbaum.

Adjunctive and Behavioral Contrast

• Killeen, P. R. (2014). A theory of behavioral contrast. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 102(3), 363-390. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.107
• Wojnicki, F. H. E., Johnson, D. S., Charny, G., & Corwin, R. L. W. (2015). Development of bingeing in rats altered by a small operant requirement. Physiology & Behavior, 152(Pt A), 112-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.09.009

Social Behavior and Coordination

• Schmitt, D. R. (1998). Social behavior. In K. A. Lattal & M. Perone (Eds.), Applied clinical psychology. Handbook of research methods in human operant behavior (p. 471–505). Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1947-2_15   This chapter is on electronic reserve through the UNT Library. Your instructor will supply you with a course passcode and you need that + your euid/euid password, to log in and view the pdf.
• Vasconcelos, I. G., & Todorov, J. C. (2015). Experimental Analysis of the Behavior of Persons in Groups: Selection of an Aggregate Product in a Metacontingency. Behavior & Social Issues, 24(1), 111–125. https://doi-org.libproxy.library.unt.edu/10.5210/bsi.v.24i0.5424